First Immigrants
Our family's immigrant origins
In January, 2018, I began to write an essay a week on my family history based on the prompts from Amy Crow Johnson's invitation to #52ancestors. Week four's essay's prompt was Invite to Dinner. Here are the first immigrants from the families of the John McCauslin and June Turnock McCauslin.
In this essay, you will meet these first immigrant families from Europe to North America:
McCauslin/McCausland
Archambault
Turnock
Stuckey
van Swearingen
Dunham
Walcott
Please enjoy visiting with them at a special dinner party!
In January, 2018, I began to write an essay a week on my family history based on the prompts from Amy Crow Johnson's invitation to #52ancestors. Week four's essay's prompt was Invite to Dinner. Here are the first immigrants from the families of the John McCauslin and June Turnock McCauslin.
In this essay, you will meet these first immigrant families from Europe to North America:
McCauslin/McCausland
Archambault
Turnock
Stuckey
van Swearingen
Dunham
Walcott
Please enjoy visiting with them at a special dinner party!
What a quandary I have been in this week! There were too many ancestors I wished to
share a conversation with over dinner, and so I spent a lot of time on the
invitation list. (No time spent on the
menu yet!)
In the final analysis, I decided to bring together the first
generations of my family lines to come to America that I have discovered so far
(and that “I” must include my nephew Michael).
This guest list brings pride for their obvious courage and/or desperation
to leave their homes and come to an unknown land. No one had an easy trip, except perhaps my
dad’s father who came from London, Ontario, to Chicago in 1899; not so easy for
his grandfather, Andrew McCausland (as far back as I can trace the McCauslands),
as he was most likely in steerage on a boat from Ulster in the second decade of
the 19th centrury. He became
a farmer in Ontario who married Julia McLarty, also an Irish immigrant, in
London, Ontario.
My paternal grandmother’s family, Jean Louis and Chantal
Desormier Archambault, came by wagon from St. Roch de l-Achignon, Quebec, to
South Bend, Indiana, just after the Civil War.
Her father went to work for Studebaker Wagon Company. But his ancestors, Jacques and Francois
Touroult Archambault, had come to French Canada in 1643. Thus, the McCauslands from Ireland and the
Archambaults from central France head the list of invitees. All these transplanted Canadians are Roman
Catholic.
Next, I need to include ancestors of my mother June Turnock
McCauslin. The first of the Turnocks,
Benjamin and Mary Whittaker Turnock, arrived in 1840 in New York City from
Stoke on Trent, Staffordshire, England.
They moved to New Jersey, but finally settled in Elkhart, Indiana
sometime after 1850. Richard’s ancestors
were masons and all his male descendants were in the constructions trades, at
least as young men. His grandson,
William Leonard, moved to South Bend and married Catherine Bridget Flynn whose
father, Thomas O Flynn, came from Tipperary in 1847, escaping the Irish famine.
So, my grandfather Ted Turnock was raised in a “mixed marriage” between an
Episcopalian and a Roman Catholic. None of their children were baptized in any
church. (An aside, eight of their nine
children married Catholics, except my grandfather.)
Now, when it comes to my grandmother, Helen Stuckey Turnock,
you find yourself with no knowledge of where the Stuckeys lived before North
Carolina. James married Rebecca
Swearingen in Fort Wayne, Indiana, in 1831. She was also born in North Carolina. The Swearingens do go back to colonial
America, New Amsterdam and the Maryland
Colony. Garrett van Swearingen,
born in Beemsterdam, The Netherlands, worked for the Dutch East India Company
until his ship stranded off Long Island and he left the Company. He
settled in New Amstel (now Delaware and there met and married his wife Barbara
DeBarrette; they and their children were naturalized in 1669 in Mary’s. I haven’t discovered if James and Rebecca’s
families came north together, but, after their marriage, they settled on land
to farm in Clay Township, St. Joseph County, Indiana (just outside the present-day
limits of South Bend).
It is with the marriages of their male descendants that we end
up again in the 17th century and the families of the first English
settlers in New England. Their son
Oliver married Marietta Webster whose ancestor was Governor John Webster of
Connecticut who came to the Massachusetts Bay Colony between 1630 and 1633. Oliver’s son Charles, my great grandfather, married
Harriet Dunham, the daughter of a farmer in Concord, Michigan. Now it gets truly complicated. She is descended from Deacon John Dunham and
his wife Agnes Smith; John was born in Scrooby, England and came from Leiden,
The Netherlands, to the Plymouth Bay Colony in 1632. But she is also descended
from Henry Wolcott and Elizabeth Saunders who came to Massachusetts Bay Colony
in 1630, because in 1808 a Dunham married a Wolcott, her grandfather Shubael
Dunham and Fannie Wolcott. In Harriet’s
family we have an historic group of dissenters from the Church of England and
then from each other who literally just kept moving on until they all settled in
Michigan on a route that included New York.
All in all, this group promises a scintillating conversation
around the dinner table. How will the
French Canadian and Irish Roman Catholics get along with the English Protestant
dissenters? Will the latter even get
along with each other? To avoid
religious controversy, they can compare the ships that brought them here and
the people they found in what they called the New World, where they discovered
it was not a new world to the people already here. Lots of room for controversy when this comes
up. There might be conflict between the
French Canadians and the New Englanders over how the Native Americans should be
treated. Will they just avoid the
differences in how they interacted with the Native Americans and the tragedies
that ensued? Or instead stick to the
conflicts of their Old World homelands? Would
major fisticuffs ensue if any such discussions begin? What will the women at this gathering bring
to the conversation when, and if, they speak up about their lives and hopes on
these journeys. Won’t it be wonderful if
these ancestors of mine are women like Anne Bradstreet or Anne Hutchison!
And, oh, dear, what drinks to serve – wine, beer, water only
(to better ensure no fisticuffs)? In the end, perhaps the safest topic will be
the foods they most enjoyed from the 17th and 19th
centuries. A lively group of men and women, for sure, and just think how much
we could learn from them! Do you have
questions you would like to ask?! Please
join us.
Comments
Post a Comment